Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 29

< April 28	April 30 >

April 29

File:Taiwan-icon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taiwan-icon.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

~~Visually identical to File:Taiwan-icon.PNG, but CSD F1 was refused on the grounds that one has a transparent background while the other is opaque. This one is unused and is not needed.~~

Orphaned; superseded by File:Taiwan-icon.svg. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this one has the transparent background. It should be used in most cases instead of the opaque background version. 'Move to commons' both versions. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 04:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If you really want to go that way, the SVG (File:Taiwan-icon.svg) should be used instead. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have orphaned the PNG and replaced it with the SVG. Now both PNGs can be deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ankhesenamun.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader Setnakhamwas' images have many problems with copyright. In many cases, the images are of low resolution and have no verifiable metadata which make me think that they were taken from a book or from the web. He/She also doesn't seem to know much about image licenses as this user's talkpage here shows. I submit that this is likely also a copyright violation. Moreover since mid-2005 the Cairo Museum has placed a camera ban on their collection and only scholars can take pictures under special circumstances. The uploader never gives a date for when he took this image; all we know is that it was uploaded much later in 2009. This looks quite suspicious and hints at a copyright violation from someone else's photo collection. Leoboudv (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In this case, it may be safer to delete. --Artene50 (talk) 03:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This image is replacable with a derivative made from File:Tutanchamon (js) 3.jpg or File:Tutankhamun and his wife B. C. 1330.jpg or File:Anuk.PNG All you need is an image of Ankhesenamun, Tutankhamun's wife. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Devgarh Royal Family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV screenshot, unnecessarily duplicating another very similar one showing the same characters in the same serial, used in the same article (File:Devgarh Royal Family 2.jpg). Nonspecific and uninformative FUR. Fails NFCC#3 and #8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Please keep it as they are not duplicating each other as if you read the article it says that one of them is a chawl resident and in the other is shown as a Princess so it's not duplicating! It's completely different from each other. I being the uploader myself suggest to keep it or the other one....

{{double image|center|Devgarh Royal Family 2.jpg|200|Devgarh Royal Family.jpg|200|The two princesses with the Queen Mother and the King without the Queen.|The princess (in middle) as a chawl resident with all the characters.}}

...as this one has all the characters while the other has the princesses, Queen Mother and the King without the Queen.--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 08:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's trivial difference. I am glad you didn't say they are wearing different clothes. Do you have any other reasons to keep these pictures?§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The host article of these pictures, Yuvrani Manyata is also being discussed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuvraj Uday Veer. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If the host articles are being deleted these pictures may be added in the main article Dekha Ek Khwaab of which these pictures' host articles are a part of. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 03:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So they can be used in either of the articles? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, after Yuvrani Manyata is deleted it will be used only in Dekha Ek Khwaab. If needed now, it will not be used in the article Yuvrani Manyata.

Comment I have fixed a WP:NFCC#9 violation on this page by commenting out a template. I haven't checked how the images are used, so no opinion on whether to keep or delete for the moment. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Please delete the picture, it will no more be needed if the host article is deleted.--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 11:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naye nasal k name.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Also, unknown source for photos included in image -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator --Leoboudv (talk) 07:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nazi Albania Flag (not official).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not official flag is orphaned image that is replaced by the actual flag: File:Flag of German occupied Albania.svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Can we please add the following to this nomination:

All of these are from the same uploader. All unused, all appear to be essentially made up; no signs of any real-world models. Numbers 1 and 2 as well as the originally nominated one are politically offensive; the others appear to be related to non-existing political entitites or unattested national ideas. No conceivable encyclopedic use for any of them. Delete all. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Yes, delete all. Glad you noticed that. I will look harder in the future. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ndp main ali.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of politician who hasn't ever won an election. Most likely not notable -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N --Leoboudv (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newspaper wikipedia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a logo for a non-notable company -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nick with first alert.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Its a good quality image if only one knew who the image depicted. There is no description. Its up to the closing Admin to decide. --Artene50 (talk) 03:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NIShape blue.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is a dup of File:NIShape blue.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created the file and uploaded it, but as the nominator points out it duplicates File:NIShape blue.png, and is un-needed. No idea why I uploaded both versions :( --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nixal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image for a GNU Linux User Group. Not-notable -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northwales.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is replaceable by better quality, more accurate map File:Medieval Wales.JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Image is also replaceable by the commons file File:Wales after the Treaty of Montgomery 1267 .svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northwales1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is replaceable by better quality, more accurate map File:Medieval Wales.JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Image is also replaceable by the commons file File:Wales after the Treaty of Montgomery 1267 .svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nottheart2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This orphaned 4 year old image is the only contribution by this uploader. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1937 Kangaroos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, go ahead and delete, a better version is this file which links to a number of articles.File:1937 Aust RL Kangaroos.jpgSticks 66 07:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:One Last pharaoh-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ourevore logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is a logo for a non-notable company. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:P1010346.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of a video matrix board pregame of a basketball game -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:P2180067.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of a housing development, facing the River Soar, Bath Lane, Leicester with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaz camera 2 019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan low quality image of Leicester City F.C. building -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pandi Hall3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan low quality images with quality so poor that subject shows no good encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parismilan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan images of non-notable skater. Possibly personal photo. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.